In light of the recent COVID-19 pandemic - OPTASY would like to offer DRUPAL website support for any Health Care, Government, Education and Non-Profit Organization(s) with critical crisis communication websites or organizations directly providing relief. Stay Safe and Stay Well.

What Are The 5 Most Common Angular Mistakes that Developers Make? 

What Are The 5 Most Common Angular Mistakes that Developers Make? 

by RADU SIMILEANU on Jun 05 2018

“Learn from your mistakes” should be every developer's life mantra. But that doesn't mean that they should be all your mistakes, right? With a list including the most common Angular mistakes at hand, you'd get to narrow down the number of possible pitfalls that you risk falling into to the... uncommon, the less predictable ones.

So, what are the traps that Angular developers fall into most often as they build their applications?

We've run our own "investigations" for you:


  • gone through the code examples on the web
  • ran an inventory of the most frequent questions on StackOverflow
  • looked over some of the issues that we've knocked our heads against while working on our own Angular projects 


… and trimmed down our list to 5 most frequent mistakes that Angular developers make:

1. ngOnChanges vs ngDoCheck: Misunderstanding When the ngDoCheck Gets Triggered 

"I have used OnPush strategy for my component and no bindings have changed, but the ngDoChecklifecycle hook is still triggered. Is the strategy not working?"

I bet that you've stumbled across this question (maybe put into different words) on various developer forums. It could easily win any “popularity” test there since it keeps coming up again and again.

But, before we give it a straight answer and settle this matter for good, let's focus on these 2 “change detecting” lifecycle hooks in Angular. And see where the problem stems from:

As you well know it, AngularJs has the watch feature, which “alerts” you whenever a value changes. Angular, on the other hand, has replaced the watch and scop feature with component inputs as properties. Moreover, it has added the ngOnChanges lifecycle hook, as well.

And here's where things get “tricky” and risk to turn into the trap that many Angular developers fall into:

The OnChanges event doesn't emit if/when a deep field of the input property changes. Hence, the value of the input is the reference of the object.

How do you approach this problem? You have several methods at hand, in fact, but I'm going to focus on the most common one:

Using the ngDoCheck lifecycle hook once you run the change detection process!

Now here's the answer that I've promised, to the above-mentioned common developer question:

The onPush strategy for detecting changes in Angular does work: the hook is triggered by the design itself!  

Note: another ridiculously frequent mistake that developers make is to take "Angular" for "AngularJS"! Be better than that: the term "AngularJS" should be used only when you refer to the old Angular and to Angular 1, while Angular 2/2+ 4 and 5 is just... "Angular". Mind you don't delve deep into this confusion yourself, too!


2. Forgetting to Unsubscribe: One of the Most Common Angular Mistakes 

“Forgetting” or simply ignoring this issue. 

And you have no “excuse”, you know, for overlooking to clean up your subscriptions in Angular. Considering that there are methods and libraries developed precisely for handling these unsubscriptions once you've finished using an event or an observable in JavaScript.

Why does this “clumsiness” risk to grow into a major issue? Because lingering subscriptions cause memory leaks in your system.

And when it comes to the unsubscription process, there are 2 scenarios:


  1. you trigger the OnDestroy lifecycle hook if it's in a component that you've subscribed in
  2. you initiate the lifecycle hook yourself if it's a service that you've subscribed in (since, in this case, there's no available hook for you to fire)


To recap: Remember to unsubscribe when you no longer use a service/component!


3. The Wrong Use of Providers

One of Angular's (compared to AngularJS) key improvements is its Hierarchical Dependency Injection, agree?

This means that now you're free to instantiate a service several times (services used to be singletons back in the AngularJS's “glory days”, remember?).

Now that being said, let's have a look at a more than likely scenario:

Imagine yourself fetching your heroes using a heroes service:

export class HeroesService {

heroes: Hero[] = [];

constructor(private http: Http) {

this.http.get('').map(res => { 

return res.json(); 

}).subscribe((heroes: Hero[]) => {

this.heroes = heroes;



getHeroes() {

return this.heroes;



Nothing unexpectedly wrong till here:


  • the data is being fetched in the constructor
  • there's also a getHeroes method for retrieving the heroes 


Now, let's take a look at the hero component, too:

selector: 'hero',template: '...',providers: [HeroesService]})export class HeroComponent {constructor(private heroesService: HeroesService) {}}@NgModule({declarations: [HeroComponent]}export class HeroesModule { ... }

As you can see, first the HeroComponent declares the HeroesService provider in the @Component.providers array, next it incorporates it in the constructor. 

All well and good till you realize that each HeroComponent instance instantiates a new instance of the HeroesService. 

To put it more simply:

Your HeroesService will be fetching the data (by HTTP request) several times, for each and every HeroComponent instance!

And this is due to the Hierarchical DI in Angular.

The solution for avoiding this issue — no doubt one of the most common Angular mistakes? 

Declaring the service in the @NgModule.providers instead:
selector: 'hero',template: '...'})export class HeroComponent {constructor(private heroesService: HeroesService) {}}@NgModule({declarations: [HeroComponent],providers: [HeroesService]}export class HeroesModule { ... }

There! The provider will now be instantiated once and for all. “For all” the HeroComponent instances I mean.

“How come?” You might ask yourself.

Because the provider (declared in the NGModule now) is a singleton now. Therefore all the other modules can use it.


4. Manipulating the DOM Directly

Although I've already said this about another mistake from this list, I now tend to consider this one here instead as being one of the most common Angular mistakes:

Manipulating the DOM directly; oftentimes from the controller itself!

And this is one of those top 10 Angular mistakes that any developer stands a high risk of making. Since manipulating the DOM is such a common task when using this platform:


  • you might need to render SVG
  • you might need to refresh a page's title based on a context change
  • you might need to set the focus on a control after a validation error
  • … and the list of possible situations goes on


Then... you fall right into it: you take the easy way out and hack the DOM directly!

Now what I feel like pointing out it here is that:

Angular's grown from a web framework into a platform!

And this can only mean that you're now free to decouple your Angular application's codebase from the renderer and:


  • have your app executed in on the server
  • … in the browser
  • … as a native app 


And decoupling opens the door to other possibilities for you to explore and to tap into, such as using web workers or AOT (ahead of time compilation).  

Speaking of the latter:

AOT enables you to compile your app's templates in the build time of your server. Moreover, you won't need to use the oversized @angular/compiler package in your bundle, which leads to a lower size and load time.

Yet, for future-proofing these “facilities” that Angular provides, you'll need to abide by... some sort of rules at least. And one of them is:

Restraining yourself from manipulating the DOM directly, using jQuery, the global document object or the ElementRef.nativeElement.

Instead, use the Renderer2 service (or Renderer for Angular 2):

It's 2 things that this wrapper to the view mutation layer will enable:


  1. for the default layer to be used in the browser
  2. for the renderer to get replaced with a more suitable one whenever your Agular app runs on another platform (e.g. a phone)


In short: Resist “temptation” and never ever touch the DOM directly!


5. Declaring The Same Component in More than Just One NgModule 

And declaring a component in multiple NGModule-s is one of those most common Angular mistakes that end up throwing an error “at” you.

“Why, so?”

Because you need to declare each component in its own NgModule — and to list it in the @Ngmodule.declarations array — in order for it to be available for the views. 

If you do need to declare the very same component in multiple modules, you'll need to consider the relationship between those modules:

Is it a parent-child one, maybe?

If this is the case, then:


  • use the child's NGModule.declaration to declare the HeroComponent in the child module
  • use the chid's NGModule.exports array to... export the HeroComponent 
  • use the parent's NGModule.imports array to import the child module 


If not (if we can't be talking about a parent-child module relationship), then you'll need to declare another NgModule as the module of the shared data.


Final Word 

It's only by knocking your head against unexpected issues while building your projects on this platform, that you'll get to grow as an Angular developer.

And still, instead of embracing the “fail fast, fail often” concept, wouldn't it be best if you:


  • learned from other developers' mistakes, thus knowing what the most common Angular mistakes are  
  • ensured that you failed "rarely" instead?

We do Web development

Go to our Web development page!

Visit page!

Recommended Stories

10 Best Headless CMS in 2020, That Cover Most of Your Requirements (Part 1)
Overwhelmed with options? Are you building your first (e-commerce) headless CMS and you don't know what headless CMS platform to choose?  What are the best headless CMS in 2020, so you can at least narrow down your choices and start... somewhere? Which system matches most of your feature requirements? Here's a top 10: 1. But First: What Is a Headless CMS, More Precisely? Relax, I won't bore you with too many details — we already have an in-depth post on the differences between headless and traditional CMS. So, if we were to sum up the concept in just a few words, we could say that: A headless content management system is an architecture where content is separated from the presentation layer (the client-side front-end). Meaning that you get to create, store, and edit "raw" content (with no design or layout) in the backend and deliver it wherever needed —wearable, mobile app, website — via API. In short, what you get in a headless architecture is: a database to store your content in a dashboard for editing your content Source: As for the "head" that serves your content to the end-user : you're free to build your own front-end, from the ground up … and even multiple front-ends, if needed, that will all use calls from the API to retrieve and display content 2. … Then What's a Decoupled CMS? Headless CMS vs decoupled CMS: what's the difference? And why headless over decoupled? The role that the API plays… That's what makes the difference (and why you'd want to go for a headless approach): If, in a decoupled architecture, the API plays the role of an intermediary between back-end and front end, in a headless architecture the API can be used by any of the front-end portions for pulling data. In other words, a decoupled CMS does come with a built-in front-end delivery layer, that you can rely on, but a headless approach is an API-driven content repository. Which gives you more flexibility for delivering content to any type of display layer. … to multiple "heads". You're free to distribute it wherever it needs to get displayed. 3. Why Choose a Headless CMS? Top 9 Benefits Before I "divulge" the best headless CMS in 2020 to you, here's a shortlist of the key advantages of using a headless CMS software: you get to engage your customers with personalized content across an entire network of digital channels, at different stages in their journey you can deliver richer digital experience, tailored to each channel you gain platform independence you're free to choose your technology of choice you benefit from cross-platform support you get to manage your content from a central location and distribute it to multiple platforms/IoT-connected devices, in a universal format you're free to manage all your platforms from one interface your development team gets to choose the development framework of their choice, integrate new technologies and, overall… innovate you're free to redesign as often as you need to, without the dread of re-implementing your entire CMS from the ground up     4. … And When Should You Use It? 5 Best Use Cases  How do you know for sure that you need to adopt this approach? You know it because your scenario describes one of the following use cases for headless CMS: you're building a site using a technology you're familiar with you're building a website with a static site generator you're building a JS-based website or web app you're building a native mobile app you're building an e-commerce site and you know that the commerce platform you're using won't… cut the mustard as a CMS; or you need to enrich product info in your online store 5. What Are the Best Headless CMS in 2020? Top 10 "Which CMS should I use?" you wonder. "The one that meets most of your requirements…" So, you should start by pinning them down. What features are you looking for in a CMS? Maybe you need a system that should: be straightforward and easy to use for the marketers/non-technical people in your team be built on… Node be highly customizable and editable for your content team to be able to change overlay text, logo, background video/image be simple to set up integrate easily with Gatsby support multi-site setups not be tied up to (just) one specific database provide ease of content entry and rich-text support provide a granular permission system provide native support for content types What are the features that your project couldn't live without? Now, with that list of "mandatory" features at hand, just drill down through your top headless CMS options in 2020. Here they are: 5.1. Storyblok A purely headless CMS that ships with a visual editor, as well. Why would you go for Storyblok? What makes it one of the best headless CMS in 2020? it provides the experience of a page builder for all those non-technical users in your team: editors get to manage content via a more user-friendly interface it grants your developers easy access to the APIs they need 5.2. Prismic Its major selling point? It allows you to choose your own language, framework, technology… And these are the 3 good reasons to go with Prismic as your headless CMS: it allows you to model your content schema and to add your content you're free to choose whatever framework that meets your feature needs: React, Vue, Next, Nuxt, Node, Gatsby… you're free to choose either GraphQL or RESTful API to query content 5.3. Drupal 8 Headless CMS   Another great option is to exploit Drupal's headless capabilities and pair them with the JavaScript framework of your choice. Here are some of the best reasons why you'd use a Drupal 8 API-first architecture: Drupal's a mature and enterprise-level headless solution backed by a wide community, used by more than 1 million sites globally; you get to tap into its massive module collection and even create new custom ones to extend your website's functionality its JSON:API follows the JSON:API specification; developers in your team can start using the API even if they're not experts in working with Drupal you get to load your GraphQl schemas straight from your Drupal content repository; there's a specialized module for this: the GraphQL module you get to use all of  Drupal's famed features (granular access to content, processes, workflows, modules, etc.) right away; you get them out-of-the-box since the REST API is… rooted deep into Drupal 5.4. Strapi, One of the Best headless CMS for Gatsby. It's an open-source Node.js headless CMS, a "host it yourself" one, that allows you to build Node.js apps in… minutes. Why would you use it? because it generates available RESTful API or uses GraphQL shortly after installation, making data available via customizable API because it allows your developers to invest all their resources in writing reusable app logic (instead of having to use some of that time to build an infrastructure) because it's fully JavaScript because it supports plugins that extend the platform's functionality because it's open-source: you'll find the entire codebase on GitHub  5.5. Contentful  Looking for a platform-agnostic solution? A… content delivery network that would enable your development team to manage and distribute (and reuse) content to multiple channels? Then this is the API-driven headless CMS you're looking for. Here are 6 other reasons why you'd want to put Contentful on your shortlist: consistent APIs easy to set up you're free to create your own models easy to use: ships with a robust, non-technical, user-friendly UI you get to add custom plugins quick and easy you get to set your own schemas to get displayed the way you want them to, across different apps Good to know! There's even a Shopify extension available. What it does is connect your online store to your content, stored in Contentful. And if you'll need help with building, fine-tuning, and integrating your content hub, we're ready to tweak Contentful to your needs.  END of Part 1! Stay tuned, for there are 5 more candidates for the title of "the best headless CMS in 2020" waiting in line.  Image by Couleur from Pixabay ... Read more
Adriana Cacoveanu / Sep 25'2020
Why Use Node.js with React? 11 Reasons Why You Should Hook Up Your React App with a Node Back-end
So, you’d like to build an app with React. And, while weighing your back-end options, you ask yourself: “Why use Node.js with React?” Why would you go with Node for hosting and running your web server? Why not… Ruby on Rails? Or maybe Python/Django? This is precisely what you’ll find in this post: the 11 main reasons why you’d want to choose Node.js as a backend for your React web app: 1. But First: What Is the Difference Between ReactJS and Node.js? We already have a blog post focused precisely on the React vs Node dilemma, so in today’s post I’ll only pinpoint, briefly, the main differences between the 2 technologies:   While ReactJS is a front-end library, Node.js is a highly popular choice for back-end development (thanks to its event-driven nature and to being asynchronous and highly scalable)   While React provides you with a language to describe the user interface of your web application, Node.js helps you with all sorts of (back-end) things like setting up your server, building CLI tools, scripting; a key difference to help you solve your “React vs Node.js” dilemma   While ReacJS helps you build your UI components, Node.js stores your app’s data in the backend   While React is web app developers’ top choice to address challenges like low performance and slow user interface, Node.js is the go-to technology for creating enterprise-level solutions based on WebSockets, event quests, and microservice architecture. 2. Does ReactJS (Really) Require Node?  In other words, do you need to have a Node.js backend to run React? No, you don’t. Node.js is not required for running Reactjs. So, why use Node.js with React? There are certain use cases and reasons why you’d want to pair the 2 technologies for building your app: you cut down on your web app development time (which always has a major business impact) the Node.js and React duo is your ticket to scalable and efficient code … But more on the strongest reasons why you’d use Reactjs with Node down below... 3. Why Use Node.js with React? 11 Top Reasons Now, going back to your initial question — “Why do you need Node.js for React?” — here are the key reasons why you’d go with this “duo”: 3.1. Because they’re both JavaScript: you can execute them server-side and client-side The benefits you get from having a JS-based technology in the back-end, as well, are obvious: you only need to be familiar with JavaScript (no Ruby or Python expertise needed) same language means… same packages same language means that you get to speed up your app’s development process 3.2. Because you get to inject V8 engine performance into your React app In other words, your React app will be perfectly equipped to handle bulk requests with no compromise on quality. The V8 engine that Node.js uses grants your app the best page load times. 3.3. Because you get a collection of NPM packages to choose from With the NPM CLI at your disposal, you get to install any of the packages available in the registry quick and easy. 3.4. Why use Node.js with React? Because the “duo” helps you address high server load issues  They work perfectly together to help your app handle multiple client requests while striking a server load balance. 3.5. Because Node.js bundles your app into a single, easy-to-compile file Using various modules along with Webpack, Node Js bundles your app into one file. One that can get compiled much easier... 3.6. Because it’s a real-time, data-intensive React app that you’re building. Does your React application depend on Data Streaming or Data-Intensive, Real-Time management? Is interactivity a major requirement for your web app? Is it a real time application that you have in mind? Then Nodejs makes the best choice for continued server connection in a context of intensive computation. 3.7. Because you get to run React.js code straight in the Nodejs environment 3.8. Because you get to scale your React & Node.js app to much higher loads A Node.js back-end will help your app accommodate many more users and many more future calls.  It's your best option for building scalable applications. The 2 giants are using Node.js precisely for its great scalability potential. 3.9. Because you get to build JSON APIs for your app much easier when using Node and React together How come? You get to share and reuse code in React.js quick and easy when you pair it with Node.js in the back-end. 3.10. Because rendering server-side becomes a more streamlined process Since React DOM comes with components built to work with Nodejs out of the box, you get to cut down on the lines of code.  Which translates into streamlined server-side rendering.   3.11. Because it’s a single-page React app that you’re building The “React with Node.js” duo makes the best choice for building a SPA. The lightweight Node backend will be in charge of handling asynchronous data loading via callback functions. 4. In Short, You’d Want to Use React and Node.js Together Because... “Why use Node.js with React?” As a conclusion, we could narrow down the entire list to just 2 key reasons:   Convenience: same language in the back-end and the front-end; Node.js makes the go-to option for running and hosting a web server for your React app   ReactJS depends on Node and npm (Node Package Manager) to notify the native side (iOS/Android) of the packages that you need to use in your app; then, it can add all the needed dependencies. The END! Now that you know why and when you’d want to use React with Node.js: how do you build that high-performance, conveniently scalable React & Node.js app? We’re here to help you get the most of these 2 technologies. Just drop us a line to have a team of React and Node Js developers handle your project. Image by Anemone123 from Pixabay ... Read more
Adriana Cacoveanu / Sep 16'2020
Create React App vs Next.js: Which One Should You Go With for Building Your Next App?
You're about to start working on a new app project and you're confused: Create React App vs Next.js - what's the difference?  Which option's best for you? Considering your SEO,  SSR, API, and performance needs. And they're frustratingly similar: they both enable you to build React apps without the need to use Webpack for bundling it (or the need to do any code splitting) they both make it possible for you to have your React app up and running in no time Still, each framework comes with its own pros and cons and specific use cases. So, in this post, you'll find your answers to the following questions: What are the key differences between CRA and Next.js? What are the main benefits of using Next.js? What are the main benefits of using Create React App? What are the downsides of Next.js? What are the downsides of Create React App? When would you want to use one over the other? 1. What's the Key Difference Between CRA and Next.js? SSR vs CSR... It's where all their differences stem from. Next.js apps are rendered on the client-side (CSR), but the framework supports server-side rendering (SSR), as well. By comparison, Create React App apps are rendered only on the client-side. In other words: CRA generates HTML code in the client browser, whereas Next.js generates it in the server, based on the URL.  So, your "Create react App vs Next.js" dilemma comes down to whether a static page meets your needs or not entirely. 2. What Are the Main Benefits of Using Next.js? Now that you know what's the fundamental difference between the 2 systems for building React apps, let's put the spotlight on Next.js. Why would you choose it? because it's so simple to set up, build, and even host a Next.js app: you have packages for almost all the key additions that call for Webpack configuration (SaSS, CSS, TS...) because rendering React apps becomes much easier, regardless of where the data comes from because you can benefit from automatic server rendering and code splitting (that will increase performance) because SSR (server-side rendering) will give your app a major performance boost  because it's a lightweight framework for both static and server-rendered universal JS apps because it's good for SEO (with everything being generated from the server...) 3. Create React App vs Next.js: What Are the Main Benefits of Using CRA? In a "Next.js vs create-react-app" debate, what are the strongest reasons for opting for CRA to build your React app? it's easier to deploy you get to build a single page React app with... zero configuration (no time-consuming setup needed) you don't need to deal with Webpack or Babel it's plain simple (an empty div and just a few js files) and provides all the needed HTML code to render your app on the client-side  the development process is much smoother better developer experience In short, with Create React App you basically run just one command and the framework sets up all the tools you need to start developing your app on the spot. 4. What Are the Downsides of Next.js? What could make you think twice before choosing Next.js for building your next app? the fact that it's opinionated: there's a Next.js way of doing things and you're constrained to... adjust to it if you later want to use a router different from its own filled-based one (or add Redux maybe), you'll discover that it's not that flexible  5. What Are the Downsides of Create React App? In a "Create React App vs Next.js" debate, why would you rule out CRA? because it only supports client-side rendering, which is not enough if it's a high-performing app that you want to build because no code splitting translates into lower performance because it's not good for SEO (since it doesn't render pages on the server) 6. When Would You Want to Use Next.js? As a rule of thumb, use Next.js: if you need to build a fast, production-ready app (SSR injects top speed into your React application) if public SEO is a crucial factor for your app project if it's a dynamic page that you need to create (wihout having to write your own bundling) if it's an eCommerce app that you're building (Next.js is more suited for the cart, the stock inventory, and other highly dynamic pages) 7. When Would You Want to Use Create React App? When would you choose it over Next.js? when you need to build a React app really fast; with CRA you can skip the configuration and the setting up part when you need to create a landing page for a product: Create React App makes it so much simpler to put it together when it's a SPA that you need to build 8. In Conclusion... CRA is easy, while Next.js "seduces" you with better performance and SEO. Is it a single page React app that you need to get up and running fast and you don't need SSR? Create React App might just be the best choice for you. Is it a fast-loading app that you're building? Is performance business-critical for you and SEO much more than just a nice-to-have? You might want to consider Next.js then for your next app. Need a team of experienced app developers to build it for you? Just send us your feature list and... let's build it! Image by Pexels from Pixabay   ... Read more
Silviu Serdaru / Aug 07'2020